home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT0734>
- <title>
- Apr. 08, 1991: Misplaced Priorities
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- Apr. 08, 1991 The Simple Life
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 28
- Misplaced Priorities
- </hdr><body>
- <p>When it comes to buying weapons, cost is no object and logic
- goes out the window. But when it comes to saving infants' lives,
- penury is the rule.
- </p>
- <p> Why does the U.S., wih lavishes nearly $300 billion annually
- on its military machine, fail to provide the relatively piddling
- sums needed to care for poor expectant mothers and their
- children? That question arises whenever new data appear about
- America's disgraceful infant-mortality rate. The short answer
- is that the question is based on the false assumption that
- squeezing the Pentagon will mean more funds for better prenatal
- care. In fact, the Administration plans to trim defense spending
- by $44 billion over the next five years. The savings will
- trickle into the S&L bailout and other fiscal black holes.
- </p>
- <p> The more appropriate question is why the U.S. has been so
- short-sighted about investing in its children. For a generation,
- public spending has tilted toward the needs of the elderly,
- including those who are relatively affluent, and away from the
- next generation. As ever, when it comes to spending priorities,
- elected officials usually follow the dictates of the most potent
- voters. Budget Director Richard Darman has eloquently denounced
- "now-nowism"--America's tendency to spend frivolously today
- rather than invest sensibly in tomorrow--even as the White
- House and its most powerful constituents embrace it. Proposals
- to raise education standards meet local opposition because they
- would be expensive and inconvenient. When the Pentagon tries to
- save billions by closing obsolete bases, hawks and doves fight
- to preserve them. Last year Americans spent $5 billion at movie
- box offices. A fraction of that sum could dramatically reduce
- infant mortality. It is all a matter of priorities.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-